<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should men get facials?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rlew.com/2008/08/should-men-get-facials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rlew.com/2008/08/should-men-get-facials/</link>
	<description>Toward a God-Entranced Vision of All Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rlew</title>
		<link>http://rlew.com/2008/08/should-men-get-facials/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>rlew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rlew.com/?p=36#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I had a similar question: Men pampering themselves is self-absorption while women pampering themselves is... (a) acceptable because they&#039;re women, (b) also self-absorbtion, or (c) ____ ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar question: Men pampering themselves is self-absorption while women pampering themselves is… (a) acceptable because they’re women, (b) also self-absorbtion, or © ____ ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://rlew.com/2008/08/should-men-get-facials/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rlew.com/?p=36#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Hm.... I dunno. Apples and oranges? I very much want as “men with chests,” as Lewis would call it. I am just uncomfortable with the male/female dichotomy that Stinson uses to get there.

Values may manifest themselves differently but I tend to think the principles are gender free. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.… I dunno. Apples and oranges? I very much want as “men with chests,” as Lewis would call it. I am just uncomfortable with the male/female dichotomy that Stinson uses to get there.</p>
<p>Values may manifest themselves differently but I tend to think the principles are gender free. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

